Skip to main content

Infrastructure / Civil Engineering / Smart Cities

Battery-free IoT: Energy-harvesting sensor nodes for structural health monitoring

Design of battery-free structural-health sensor nodes that run on vibration, thermal and solar energy harvesting with supercapacitor storage, validated in a 200-sensor pilot on 3 bridges before a wider rollout. The 20-year maintenance-free life is a design target.

What we did: We designed the energy-harvesting sensor node (harvesting front end, supercapacitor power management, sensing and wake-up radio), its ultra-low-power firmware, the solar gateways and the analytics platform.

Public infrastructure authority20 months

Published Last reviewed:

200
Sensors in bridge pilot
3
Bridges in pilot
20 years
Maintenance-free design life
Design target
< 10 µW
Average node power
Design target
Illustrative photo: a solar-powered sensor module mounted under a highway bridgeIllustrative image

The challenge

A national infrastructure authority responsible for thousands of kilometers of highways, hundreds of bridges, and critical tunnels needed a scalable structural health monitoring solution that could operate for decades without battery replacements or maintenance in harsh outdoor environments.

Aging infrastructure

Over 40% of bridges and tunnels were over 50 years old, with unknown structural degradation. Manual inspections occurred only annually, potentially missing developing issues between inspection cycles.

Impact: 3 unexpected closures in 5 yearsClient-reported baseline

Maintenance impossibility

Traditional battery-powered sensors required replacement every 2-5 years. With structures spanning hundreds of kilometers in remote areas, battery replacement was logistically impossible and prohibitively expensive.

Impact: Battery replacement impractical at scaleClient-reported baseline

Environmental extremes

Sensors needed to operate in temperatures from -30°C to +60°C, 100% humidity, vibration from heavy traffic, and exposure to road salt, de-icing chemicals, and UV radiation.

Impact: 50% of previous sensors failed within 3 yearsClient-reported baseline

Connectivity gaps

Many structures were in areas with no cellular coverage. Running power or communication cables to sensor locations was cost-prohibitive and structurally invasive.

Impact: Zero existing connectivityClient-reported baseline

Data overload risk

Previous sensor trials generated so much raw data that analysis became impractical. The authority needed actionable insights, not terabytes of unprocessed data.

Impact: Prior systems abandoned due to data burdenClient-reported baseline

Impact figures describe the situation before the project, as the client reported it to us; we did not measure them.

Our solution

We engineered a battery-free structural health monitoring system using multi-source energy harvesting, ultra-low-power electronics, and anomaly detection that turns raw sensor data into maintenance alerts.

System architecture

Tiered architecture with energy-autonomous sensor nodes, solar-powered edge gateways, and cloud-based AI analytics for predictive maintenance.

Energy harvesting sensor nodes

  • Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting from traffic
  • Thermoelectric harvesting from temperature differentials
  • Miniature solar cells for ambient light harvesting
  • RF energy harvesting for gateway-powered wake-up
  • Supercapacitor energy storage (no batteries)

Sensing capabilities

  • MEMS accelerometers for vibration analysis
  • Strain gauges for stress monitoring
  • Tilt sensors for displacement detection
  • Corrosion sensors for reinforcement degradation
  • Temperature and humidity for environmental context

Edge gateway layer

  • Solar-powered aggregation gateways
  • Wake-up radio for on-demand sensor interrogation
  • LTE-M/NB-IoT backhaul (LoRaWAN where there is no cellular coverage)
  • Edge AI for initial anomaly filtering
  • 30-day local data buffering

Cloud analytics platform

  • Digital twin integration with BIM models
  • ML-based structural health scoring
  • Predictive maintenance scheduling
  • Regulatory reporting automation
  • Mobile app for field inspectors

Energy harvesting sensor node design

Controller
Ultra-low-power controller with sub-threshold operation
Power Consumption
< 10 µW average at one strain/vibration snapshot per hour; 100 nW sleep (design target)
Energy Harvesting
Piezo + TEG + Solar (1-100µW)
Storage
100mF supercapacitor (no battery)
Radio
Wake-up receiver + IR-UWB burst transmitter to a gateway on the same span
Sensors
3-axis accel, strain, temp, humidity, corrosion
Enclosure
IP68, -40°C to +85°C, UV resistant
Lifespan
20 years with no maintenance (design target)

Ultra-low-power firmware

  • Event-driven architecture with aggressive sleep modes
  • On-device FFT and feature extraction
  • Adaptive sampling based on harvested energy budget
  • Intermittent computing with state checkpointing
  • Self-calibration and health monitoring
  • Compressed data transmission protocol
  • Time synchronization for distributed sensing

Structural health AI analytics

The analytics platform learns the vibration 'fingerprint' of each structure and flags subtle changes that can indicate developing problems. The figures below are design targets; they have not been validated over a structure's service life.

Modal analysis AI

Variational autoencoder for frequency analysis

Detects 0.5% changes in natural frequency

Design target

Anomaly detection

Isolation Forest + deep learning ensemble

94% true positive, <2% false alarm rate

Design target

Remaining useful life

Physics-informed neural network

6-month prediction with 85% accuracy

Design target

Load estimation

CNN on vibration signatures

±5% traffic load estimation

Design target

Corrosion progression

Time-series forecasting model

Corrosion rate prediction ±10%

Design target

Implementation timeline

Phase 1: Technology development

24 weeks
  • Energy harvesting optimization for local conditions
  • Ultra-low-power node electronics design
  • Sensor node prototyping and validation
  • Communication protocol development

Phase 2: Pilot deployment

16 weeks
  • 200-sensor pilot on 3 bridges
  • Baseline data collection and model training
  • Gateway and platform development
  • Performance validation through load testing

Phase 3: Production readiness

20 weeks
  • Node production for the wider rollout
  • Quality assurance and reliability testing
  • Installation methodology refinement
  • Training for installation teams

Phase 4: Rollout support

24 weeks
  • Rollout to further structures
  • AI model refinement per structure type
  • Integration with authority systems
  • Operations handover

Results & impact

The 200-sensor pilot on 3 bridges was used for baseline data collection, model training and performance validation through load testing before the wider rollout. Long-term reliability, the 20-year design life and failure-prediction horizons are design targets; inspection-cost and safety outcomes are not published.

How to read the labels: Design target = an engineering target, not a field measurement; Client-reported baseline = the client's own figure for the situation before the project; we did not measure it. Figures without a label are specifications or project scope.

Energy autonomy

Battery-free

Piezo, thermoelectric and solar harvesting into a supercapacitor

Average node power

Design target

< 10 µW

At one strain/vibration snapshot per hour; 100 nW in sleep

Design life

Design target

20 years

No battery replacement or maintenance

Technologies used

  • Ultra-Low-Power Controller
  • Piezoelectric Harvesting
  • TEG
  • Supercapacitors
  • IR-UWB
  • Wake-up Radio
  • LTE-M/NB-IoT
  • LoRaWAN
  • TensorFlow
  • Azure IoT
  • Autodesk BIM 360
  • React
  • Python

Related case studies

Related services, industries and guides